Team & Culture
These questions explore how people behave around you, who stays in your organisation, who speaks — and the gap between what you see and what others experience working with you. Answer based on what is consistently true, not your best or worst period.
My strongest team members tend to leave within 12–18 months, while those who stay rarely push back on my decisions.
When I'm not in the room, the quality or direction of decisions noticeably drops.
There are people on my team whose performance concerns me that I have not directly addressed in the last 90 days.
Team members seem to withhold their honest opinions in meetings, but I hear different views expressed informally afterward.
Certain relationships in my team feel managed rather than genuine — people are careful around each other in ways I haven't resolved.
I have made commitments to team members about culture, pay, or direction that I haven't fully delivered on.
When conflict arises between team members, I tend to let it run longer than I should before stepping in.
The people closest to me in the business have a different picture of how things are going than people further from me do.
Decision-Making
These questions examine how decisions actually get made in your business — who has authority, who gets heard, how much second-guessing occurs, and whether your decision architecture produces clarity or confusion over time.
Decisions I've already made get relitigated in follow-up conversations, often by the same people who agreed at the time.
I hold back information from my team when making decisions because I'm not confident they'll use it well.
Strategic decisions get stalled waiting for my sign-off when I'm unavailable, rather than being made by whoever is closest to the issue.
I've overturned decisions made by direct reports in ways that undermined their authority, and I didn't address the impact of that with them.
My organisation struggles to separate data-driven analysis from my intuition when making significant calls — the two get blurred.
I avoid making a final call on certain decisions because I don't want to be wrong or I don't want to own the outcome.
New initiatives are regularly added before existing ones are completed, creating an overloaded pipeline that nobody fully owns.
My organisation lacks a clear, agreed method for how decisions of different sizes get made — team members are often uncertain about what they're authorised to decide.
Financial Patterns
These questions look at the relationship between your leadership behaviour and your organisation's financial health — how money moves, where it gets held or lost, and whether your patterns around revenue, cost, and investment are producing the results you intended.
Revenue in my business is heavily dependent on my personal relationships or direct involvement — if I stepped back, it would drop.
I've made financial commitments — to staff, suppliers, or partners — that I've later had to renegotiate or walk back.
I have invested in people, tools, or initiatives that didn't deliver, and I held onto them longer than the evidence justified.
There are cost or margin problems in my business I'm aware of but haven't addressed because of the relational or reputational discomfort involved.
My pricing decisions are influenced by what I fear the market will accept rather than by what the product or service genuinely delivers.
I use financial metrics primarily to justify decisions already made, rather than as an input that genuinely changes what I decide.
Cash flow surprises me more often than it should — the numbers at the end of a period are materially different from what I expected mid-period.
My personal financial needs and my business's financial health are not cleanly separated — one regularly affects decisions in the other.
External Relationships
These questions examine how you relate to customers, suppliers, advisors, and the market — whether your external commitments are kept, how you handle broken trust outside the organisation, and whether your reputation reflects the business you intend to run.
I have clients or customers whose concerns I've minimised or dismissed rather than properly addressed, and the relationship hasn't recovered.
My business has made promises to the market — about delivery, quality, or outcomes — that it hasn't consistently kept.
I've used advisors, consultants, or partners and then disregarded their input without explaining why — leaving them unclear about what I actually wanted.
There are supplier or partner relationships in which the power dynamic has become coercive — either I'm dependent on them or they feel dependent on me in ways that aren't healthy.
My public positioning — what I say about my business externally — is materially better than the internal reality my team experiences.
I've walked away from external relationships — clients, partners, advisors — without a clean ending, leaving unresolved tension or confusion about what happened.
I find myself managing external relationships differently depending on how much I need from them — I'm more accommodating to those with leverage over me.
My business's external reputation — what the market genuinely thinks — lags behind the quality I believe we deliver.
Leader's Interior
These questions examine what is happening inside you as a leader — your self-awareness, your relationship to fear and control, what you protect, and whether the version of yourself you present publicly is the same one making decisions privately. Answer with the same honesty you'd ask of anyone else in the building.
There is a version of my leadership story I tell publicly that I know is more flattering than accurate.
I can identify a specific fear — of failure, exposure, irrelevance, or abandonment — that regularly shapes how I behave in the business, even when I don't name it out loud.
I hold a standard for others in the business that I do not consistently apply to myself.
When things go wrong in my business, my first instinct is to identify who or what is responsible before examining my own contribution to the situation.
I am aware of a recurring pattern in my leadership — something I've done before, seen the cost of, and done again — that I haven't yet changed.
My physical health, sleep, or emotional regulation has deteriorated in ways that are affecting my capacity to lead — and I haven't treated this as a business problem.
There are people I owe a direct conversation to — about something I said, decided, or failed to do — that I haven't yet had.
If the people closest to me — in the business and outside it — were asked to describe what drives my decision-making, their answer would surprise or uncomfortable me.
Your Report Is Ready
Your 40 responses have been scored. Your Primary Leadership Pattern, damage projection, structural root, and three calibrated first steps are waiting — held in this session until you unlock them.
- Primary Leadership Pattern — one of eight, named in exact business language
- 12, 24 & 36-month damage projection — what this pattern costs if left unchanged
- Structural root — the underlying driver beneath the visible behaviour
- Three calibrated first steps — specific to your pattern, not generic advice
- Five dimension scores — Culture, Decisions, Finance, External, Interior
Secured by Stripe · 256-bit SSL · Your answers are held in this session
Your Leadership Diagnostic Report
Based on your 40 responses, here is what the pattern data reveals about your leadership and the structural cost it is currently producing.
Culture Health Score
Your overall score and the five dimensions that compose it. A score above 70 indicates healthy structure. Between 40–69 indicates active erosion. Below 40 indicates structural concern in that domain.
Primary Leadership Pattern
Damage Projection
If this pattern remains unchanged, here is the projected structural cost at each horizon.
Structural Root
What sits underneath this pattern
Three First Steps
These are not generic recommendations. They are calibrated to your specific pattern and score profile.
This pattern is addressable. Here is what the pathway looks like.
The structural work required is specific, sequential, and achievable. The coaching program is built around the exact pattern this diagnostic has identified — not generic leadership development, but a direct engagement with what the data shows.